abortions for everyone under a age of 40
Population numbers prequel, a meeting in the corporation known
as, "The holding house of the world itself."
Part 1 The history of the corporation known as, "The holding house of the
world itself," up to the start of the population crisis
Now it happened over time that people wanted to store excess food and
clean drinking water so they would not starve, dehydrate or get sick
from unclean water and so that the excessive labor of the type they
had little choice in selecting would not harm their body faster than it would heal.
Although methodically planned exercise can be beneficial, the
mandatory nature of the work required for minimal sustenance of food
and clean water did more harm than good resulting in excesses and
deficiencies that wore down the body faster than it could heal or
build up in strength.
Many people concluded that the average burdensome labor per person
could be reduced by working in groups instead of laboring individually
and so many organizations and institutions formed and corporations and
trading practices developed.
Population growth at that time period in history became a means to
train the next generation to work to help your life be less burdensome
in the future
Some people found with so much excessive food stored one could form a
group to steal, deceive or use violence or the threat of violence to
take other groups resources
Some groups had to form to protect against other groups
Some of these groups prospered and some failed both through ethical
and unethical means
But at the end of it a single group formed called, "the holding house
of the world itself."
This group owned most of the food and clean drinking water in the
entire world indirectly through other groups each of its members owned
or managed. It was a group of many groups that each contained many
layers of many groups below them.
Now some of the people in the group were more ethical than others but
they all knew if they did not work together to make the world supply
stable they would die. They could not maintain the resources working
alone as it would return to a state of fatally excessive labor and
also working alone they would have no means to prevent unethical
groups of people from seizing their stuff. Those who had little
compassion for others still worked on the team and had some concern
for others' well being simply to have workers alive to keep the
storage supply up so they do not starve personally as an individual.
And those who had concern that other people than themself did not
starve also of course wanted to maintain the storage and knew that if
they did not work with the less compassionate majority at the top they
would be outnumbered and it would bring doom for everybody.
Now usually the food supply of the world grew as new agricultural
technology developed, but eventually agriculture became so efficient
most people did not have to work to grow food. And there was
beginning to be a problem, the majority of people started to feel
entitled to have food other people produced given to them by force
with nothing given in exchange for the food to help the food
producers. Now it was OK when a small percentage of the people on the
top did this in exchange for security to protect from groups run by
other people on the top stealing the food, because as long as it was
ensured that only a small enough percentage of the population ran the
unethical security racket and did not grow their own food the storage
could be maintained.
Having one group extort food in exchange for keeping another group
that would also extort or steal food in check was disapproved of by
those at the top who did not get there by unethical means but they
tolerated it to prevent a bloodbath and to prevent everyone from
losing all their resources. You see if those at the top who got to
their position ethically tried to stop the security racket of the
unethical members of the top, the unethical members at the top would
kill them but also many small unauthorized groups would form and the
percentage of people who take by force, theft or deception would get
so high that everyone would run out of resources and die.
Those at the top who got their by unethical means knew a careful
balance was needed and not too many people could be in the security
racket or everyone would starve including themselves, so it was in their
own best interest to limit the number of groups who take resources by
theft, fraud and deception and limit the size of their own group as
well.
Now if the majority got to the top ethically perhaps something could
be done to purge those who got to their position unethically but at
least 2/3 of those at the top got their by owning sub corporations
that used stealing, lying, violence or the threat of violence but only
occasionally and in moderation. Those at the top who did not keep the
unethical behavior of their sub corporation in moderation were purged
even by other unethical members at the top because they knew if they
exceeded their limit everyone would starve.
From time to time there was a meeting in which they examined past food
and water storage data for the last 33 years and planned the future
for the next 66 years
There was a crisis because too large a percentage of the population
felt entitled to free stuff even if it meant using violence, theft,
fraud or the threat of violence to get that free stuff and these
people were not in authorized security groups. This happened after
agriculture became so efficient that less than 20% of the population
needed to farm to produce their own food and they started to feel free
food even if it is free at the expense of someone else's labor was a
human right. Moreover many people had never learned how to farm
anymore and were unwilling to learn, they felt they had a right to
food without farming because farming was an old and out dated 20th
century practice and not with the times. They felt more like getting
useless degrees like PhDs in modern English even though they already
were native speakers of modern English and not learning it as a second
language which might be different. But more commonly they liked to
just watch television all day and hear slogans such as, “I will give
you free food if you vote for me.”
The meeting to discuss the crisis of the food storage based on the
population data and what to do about the overpopulation of
unauthorized freeloaders will be discussed in the next section of this
prequel
Part 2 Meritocracy’s poetic description of the ignorant population
problem before the corporation known as, "The holding house of the
world itself."
Now each person in the room went by a nickname describing their
disposition and not their actual name in the boardroom
A human who we shall name Meritocracy explained the problem
There are
A lot of stupid people
Burning down the world who
Consume more food than they produce
Defile more water than they make Drinkable and
Expend more Electric power than they generate, they set
Fire to the world through stagnation refusing to tend to the Forests
properly, they pretend dead trees are alive and burn the living. They
are
Greedy for what they did not make putting a mandatory burden on the
helpful and productive that is more than they can bear, they eliminate
more plants than they Grow in the name of pretty lawns and roads to
nowhere ensuring there houses are unaffordable for the next generation
so they can brag what money they made, if they were to sell it,
meanwhile spending more than the sales value they raised on cosmetic
home improvements that waste plenty of time setting up to feed no one
with their useless manicured lawns, were they to sell it they would be
at a loss having spent more than they put in to raise the sales value
by annually taxing the sales value of the home itself, and it is not
just urbanites and suburbanites, a productive fruit bearing tree or
medicinal plant in the rainforest or jungle will be burned by
primitives after they are civilized by so called modern cultures to
Graze livestock that produce less value in food and medicine than the
tree or plant itself. By burning and consuming more plants than they
grow and burning fossil fuels to build roads to nowhere, we are
running out of breathable oxygen as they set the world on fire.
Clearly such behavior is a symptom of their overall pattern that they
Harm more people and animals than they Heal,
Insanity rules their hearts persecuting the sane to avoid the effort
of thinking and Investigation, such people are
Jerks
Killing more lives than they save or rescue and giving birth and adopting not to
Lead the next generation to success but to cause
More bad than good in each child. In each child they fabricate an
evil persona through Malice and negligence. They Manufacture a new
persona through
Numerous traumas
Often exceeding the number of traumas created through simple errors
and mistakes. Instead they mold a
Person into a Persona that is a facemask of corruption, were their
children to show an appearance of Purity cleaning, growing, healing
and improving the world around them more than they defile, damage and
destroy they would be Persecuted. A willingly ignorant Population
that refuses to investigate new information to do Proper action based
on the truth does more harm than good Per Person and there are too
many of them to overcome evil with such an excessively smaller
Population of good doers.
Then Meritocracy shortened the lengthy poem of a problem to a
prolifically wordy statement
Were they as a combined sum total to contribute more than they
consume, defile, damage and expend there would be no limit to what
their Population could be. Even if most of them when measured as a
single individual produced a net loss but simply allowed the
productive minority to grow the world more in combined total than the
combined majority stagnates it there would be no limit to a sustainable
population but the ignorant have conspired in mass with every breath
they take to stop those who would make the world grow prosperous in
life and health.
But since what he said was to vague in spite of his verbose wordiness
he explained things in a simple mathematical explanation
which shall be explained in the next part
Part 3 Meritocracy explains his model for analysis of the data
Meritocracy, realizing he was rambling vaguely without actually
showing any data to describe the problem itself at hand, suddenly
scrambled upon bringing up a set of many charts, graphs, data and
extrapolated mathematical formulas full of predictive functions to
guess future trends if different choices were made. After looking
shocked and embarrassed for a moment he set up his presentation aids
then started speaking again.
We have a certain storage of each resource clean drinking water,
breathable oxygen, plants edible for human consumption, plants that
change carbon dioxide to oxygen so animals can breath, electrical
power to bring light so people do not trip and fall to their death at
night and to refrigerate and freeze food so we do not lose our entire
stockpile of fresh and healthy food and to be used to power water
cleaning plants and keep modern hospital technology working and allow
for faster research through electronic libraries so people can know
how to be productive and so on.
If we run out of oxygen food or water we will all die and if we run
out of electricity people will continue to live but a lot of them will
indirectly die as a result of a cascade of events and worst of all the
survivors will lose the electronic storage of knowledge explaining how
to be productive resulting in a shortage of food and clean drinking
water and a loss of modern medical knowledge.
We can look at eight factors
1
the net expenditure per person per time of each of the resources we
listed of those people who consume more than they produce
2
the population of willingly ignorant people who expend more than they
produce and who are unwilling to change that when presented with the
proper information and given the opportunity to change their actions
3
the net production per person per time of those who produce more than
they consume for each resource
4
the population of people who produce more than they consume
5
the net rate per surface area per time at which nature itself can rain
clean drinking water or grow plants in the wild in areas humans do not
interfere in, that we have hidden from the flat maps and round globes
and curated and censored satellite and computer images we distribute
to the general population or in other cases areas we have allowed them
to see but forbidden them to travel to
6 the surface area we have hidden from the general population or
forbidden them to travel which is also wild land
7 time
8 What we currently have stored for each of those resources
The net world production is equal to the production per useful person
times the number of useful people plus the production per area of
wildland times the area of wildland minus the loss per malignant
person times the number of malignant people
Now this is a differential system of equations and we would integrate
the production as a function of time and add it to the initial storage
value at a set time to estimate the storage value at a future time
such as
the following formula was presented on a projection screen
d clean water / dtime = (number of humans purifying water * amount of
water purified per human per time) + (amount of clean water rained per
area per time) * (area in which water is rained)- (number of humans
defiling water*amount of water defiled per human per time)
And he went on speaking
Now the comparison for the growth rate for each of the two
populations, one malignant and the other useful and beneficial, might
look something like the following but it is really much more
complicated than that and the numbers would be different and the
equations more complicated. This might be an example of if women who
mated with the group of malignant men produced about 3 children each
at the ages of 19, 20 and 21 years old and women who mated with the
group of useful men produced only 1.73 children once at 32 and
sometimes a second one at 33 years of age 73% of the time.
And these were the formula Meritocracy presented on the screen
d P / dt = P * 0.5 * (N - 2) / [ ( Y + 1 + ….. + Y + N ) / N years ]
N = Number of children given birth to
( Y + 1 ) years = age in which first child is given birth to
( Y + N ) years = age in which last child is given birth to
Assume 1 child is given birth to every year between Y + 1 year and Y +
N years inclusively
P * 0.5 is because men do not give birth to children and half of children given birth to will be woman
(N - 2) is because the population will not increase if a couple of two parents has two children after the parents die out, in order for the population to increase they must have more than 2 children and the population will decrease if they have less than 2 children if the parents eventually die off.
M = number of malignant people
U = number of useful people
d M / dt = M * 0.5 * (3-2) / ( [19+20+21] / 3 years )
d M / dt = M / 40 years
d M / dt = M * 0.025
d U / d t = U*0.5* (1.73-2) / ( [1*32 + 0.73*33] / 1.73 ) years
d U / dt = - 0.135 U / 32.4219653179 years
d U / dt = - U / 240.162706059 years
d U / d t = - U * 0.00416384382243 per year
M0 = 0.8 * 8 billion = 6.4 billion
U0 = 0.2 * 8 billion = 1.6 billion
M0 is the number of Malignant people in the world in the current year
U0 is the number of useful people in the world in the current year
t = 0 during the current year
M = 6.4 billion * e ^ ( t / 40 years)
U = 1.6 billion * e ^ (t / - 240.162706059 years)
1 / ( [ 1 / 40 ] - [ - 1 / 240.162706059 ] ) = 34.2890328891
6.4 billion / 1.6 billion = 4
M / U = 4 * e ^ ( t / 34.2890328891 years)
M / U right now is 4 at t = 0 years
M / U in 33 years from now is 10.4719599829
M / U in 19 years from now is 6.96158649981
M / U in 52 years from now is 18.2253638109
e ^ ( 1 / 34.2890328891 ) = 1.02959327315
e ^ ( 33 / 34.2890328891 ) = 2.61798999573
e ^ ( 19 / 34.2890328891 ) = 1.74039662495
e ^ ( 52 / 34.2890328891 ) = 4.55634095273
e = 2.71828182846
The problem is not that the population of people is exponential but
that the population of useful people is facing exponential decay while
at the same time the population of malignant people is exponential and
growing. Right now there are 4 times as many malignant people as
useful people and if each useful person contributes 5 times as much as
a malignant person consumes, defiles or destroys than things can
balance out but based on the hypothetical birth data above for
malignant vs useful people in 19 years there will be 6 or 7 times as
many malignant people as useful people requiring each useful person to
produce 7 or 8 times as much as a malignant person consumes and in 33
years there will be 10 or 11 malignant people for every useful person
requiring each useful person to produce 11 or 12 times as much as a
malignant person consumes and in 52 years there will be 18 or 19 times
as many malignant people as useful people requiring each useful person
to produce 19 or 20 times as much as each malignant person consumes.
Note
Some of the information above is fictional used for the purpose of a
story line and not all of it is based on real life measurements.
The annual percent increase in the number of malignant people in the story is not based on real life data but based on assuming each malignant mother gives birth to three children which is the lowest integer whole number of children she can give birth to that can result in above sub-replacement fertility rate and that she has her first pregnancy start conception at 18 years old which is the lowest universal legal age in the United States ignoring exceptions for specific states or court cases and has her second and third child as soon as possible afterward without having twins or triplets rounding the time between pregnancies to one year instead of nine months and rounding the time of her first child being born to 19 years old instead of 18 years and 9 months old. This results in a higher annual growth rate for the population subgroup of malignant people than when the population growth peaked in the 1960s for the population group that was being measured as a whole in the reference below but that does not necessarily make it unrealistic because different subgroups of a single population group can have higher or lower percent growth rates than the group they are a subgroup of. But more importantly this story is fiction and the numbers are not necessarily going to line up with real life data especially if they are exaggerated to show a point.
The annual percent increase in the population of useful people is based on the number of child births per woman in the lowest state and the higher average age of marriage for women in the “western” region of the United States as described in references below. The author was looking for a low population growth rate of people and chose these numbers to formulate the growth rate of productive people in the story even though these quantities might not represent the growth rate of productive people in real life since that is not what the quantities were originally intended to measure when collected. These quantities are used outside the real life original context and intent of measurement to fit the background of a fictional story, not a real life model for a real life problem.
The mathematical model in this story is also over simplified in many ways and has many faults someone could point out in a real life situation but this is made simple to fit the background of a fiction story.
The annual percent increase in the number of unproductive people in the story is approximately 2.53%
Multiplying the population by e ^ ( 1 / 40 ) = 1.02531512052 every year converts to 2.531512052% annual growth rate
A 2% annual growth rate converts to multiplying the population by 1.02 every year
A 1% annual growth rate converts to multiplying the population by 1.01 every year
Sub-replacement fertility is a total fertility rate (TFR) that (if sustained) leads to each new generation being less populous than the older, previous one in a given area. The United Nations Population Division defines sub-replacement fertility as any rate below approximately 2.1 children born per woman of childbearing age, but the threshold can be as high as 3.4 in some developing countries because of higher mortality rates.[1] Taken globally, the total fertility rate at replacement was 2.33 children per woman in 2003.[1] This can be "translated" as 2 children per woman to replace the parents, plus a "third of a child" to make up for the higher probability of males born and mortality prior to the end of a person's fertile life.[a] In 2020, the average global fertility rate was around 2.4 children born per woman.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-replacement_fertility
https://web.archive.org/web/20230621135920/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-replacement_fertility
Annual growth rate reached its peak in the late 1960s, when it was at
around 2%. The rate of increase has nearly halved since then, and will
continue to decline in the coming years.
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
https://web.archive.org/web/20220204043213/https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
The 1.73 children given birth to by each woman who chooses to mate
with a useful man in the fictional data is based on new hampshire
being the lowest listed in this link
https://www.insider.com/the-average-number-of-kids-per-family-in-every-state-2019-2
Among 2020 couples, the data indicates the average age of marriage
skews slightly higher out West (brides, age 31
https://www.theknot.com/content/average-age-of-marriage
https://web.archive.org/web/20211206232515/https://www.theknot.com/content/average-age-of-marriage
How to article on population growth rate calculations and differential equations
https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Calculus/Differential_Calculus_for_the_Life_Sciences_%28Edelstein-Keshet%29/11%3A_Differential_equations_for_exponential_growth_and_decay/11.02%3A_Differential_equation_for_unlimited_population_growth
https://web.archive.org/web/20230703023219/https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Calculus/Differential_Calculus_for_the_Life_Sciences_%28Edelstein-Keshet%29/11%3A_Differential_equations_for_exponential_growth_and_decay/11.02%3A_Differential_equation_for_unlimited_population_growth
End Note
This is a work of fiction and the data is fictitious
Someone in the crowd asked how he concluded that 20% of the world
population were useful
Meritocracy continued speaking
In the past, we could have actually estimated how much of the
population are currently malignant or productive based on occupation
data in careers that are malignant or productive and unemployment
data. Malignant careers of course cause more problems than mere
unemployment because someone simply not producing food is negligible
as long as they do not use force to stop those who would produce food
as so many in the public sector have done. This occupation data was
published by all or almost all countries that are members of the
United Nations and still is but is no longer trustable after the war
on female illiteracy.
Doing so would have been a very complicated process and probably
actually resulted in less than 20% being useful in the current year,
however, I am trying to be optimistic and to save time so I simply
chose 20% based on many studies related to the Pareto effect. Only
about 2% of the population in the United States is involved in
agriculture so the actual figure might be as low as 2% that are useful
but other professions are needed to assist farmers and farming is more
efficient in the United States than some other countries so on a
worldwide scale 2% would be an underestimate.
25% to 30% of the world’s population were farmers in the early 21st
century and late 20th century before the first cis gender female
president of the United States war on female illiteracy in which she
said, “I promise I will bomb whichever country has the smallest
percentage of women enrolled in college one year after my first day of
office. I will do so in order to create worldwide competition for
which country can have the highest enrollment rate of women in
University classes. But that is just the start, I can do more and we
can do more collectively. We will also bomb the country with the
second lowest enrollment rate next, after we turn the sand to glass in
the first one and the second one, we will continue the process, one country at a time
until 100% women’s enrollment is achieved worldwide.” To make things
worse she also said, “don’t marry no hic farmer, and pop out babies
that can not read or write, get a college degree.” After that tragic
set of events, we have been unable to survey the number of farmers in
third world countries and can no longer trust the data published by
the countries on employment by occupation. But we estimate less than
20% of those employed worldwide are in the agricultural industry.
Additionally it is sharply declining as more than half of women
surveyed in the countries she bombed said they would not marry a
farmer under any circumstances. This means since children who do not
have a parent who was a farmer are very unlikely to farm and since most men will fear being unmarried if they go into farming due to her brainwashing women’s preference against marrying farmers, most of the remaining farmers were already farmers before she was selected as
President and when they die or retire there will be a massive famine
on our hands. Fortunately those people in the United States did not
really pay attention to what her mad drug ridden Syphilis infected
brain said with the assassination scandal and the questionable
election of the transgender woman who appointed her as vice president
before his untimely death. So her words had little direct effect on
their farming and college enrollment rates, of course people in the
United States were already mostly out of the farming industry decades
ago having already been affected by the college bug before she took
office.
Part 4 Meritocracy’s explanation of his survey
This is a work of fiction and the survey data is fictitious
Now currently much less than 20% of the population produce more than
they expend.
The Pareto principle states that 80% of causes come from 20% of events
and although there is no truth to that being true for any and
everything based on valid logic and reason, many studies have shown
such a thing to be approximately true in the cases of what they were
studying. And such is true in our case.
We found that less than 20% of the United States population both grow
plants for food and change unsafe drinking water into clean drinking
water in excess of what they eat and drink. Moreover we conducted a
survey asking people if they were offered a free plot of land only to
be used for farming and given a free house next to it and were given
the opportunity to learn farming through free courses of instruction
if they would be willing to farm food to feed themself. More than 80%
of them said no and gave one of two possible reasons why. Some said
farming is too hard work, I would rather just do another job to get my
food and others said I would rather get my food from food stamps or
other programs without work. Less than 20% of those who did not farm
already said they would be willing to take the educational courses and
farm if given free land and courses. Meritocracy then said this of
course was a survey of people who did not already farm because we do
not need to persuade those who are already doing their part to build
up our stockpile so if we found out they were a farmer already we
discontinued the survey. Hearing they did not continue the survey for
those already farming the audience started laughing. He further said
the majority of people were so lazy and ignorant they said they would
not be willing to take a farming educational course even if they could
do it by watching free videos without getting up from their lazy
reclining chair because they would rather spend that time watching
their favorite show on television. At the mention that they would
rather watch television and some pun on the word lazy and a certain
trademark brand that was not named but implied as a joke with no
implied preference of one brand over another the audience started
laughing hilariously.
Since more than 80% of the surveyed sample of the population of non farmers are
not merely unable to grow food due to a lack of knowledge or farmland
ownership but unwilling to grow food even if given the opportunity we
have a real food crisis on our hands. This situation was not as
drastic in the past because many people could grow more than five
times what they consumed to enable less than 20% of the population to
be farmers safely and in fact that was why our ancestors formed the
corporation known as, "The holding house of the world itself," so we
could take a break from farming labor and relax a little by organizing non farming members of society to provide services to farmers, keeping farmers, farmland, food and seeds safe to guarantee a food supply for ourselves.
But now the percentage of people willing to farm has reached such a
low and the percentage that are not even willing to offer farmers
goods or services in exchange for food but just expect free food as a
human right has reached such a high percentage due to college
propaganda and offers of free stuff from politicians trying to get
elected that we will for the second 33 year cycle in a row have less
food and clean water in storage than before if something is not done.
Based on our mathematical extrapolation less than 66 years from now we
will all starve if the problem is not fixed before the end of the
upcoming 33 year cycle.
In fact our estimates predict we will run out of clean food and water
within less than 52 years from now and by we I mean us in the
boardroom not merely those outside our boardroom but us personally.
And you know we as non farming members of the boardroom can not go
back to farming in such a situation. I mean that not as a joke about
avoiding hard physical labor as a member of the ruling aristocracy but
instead I mean that quite literally because when the non-farming
majority are starving they will kill us to take what little we have
farmed if we try it.
The storage will be cut in half before 33 years from now but the
section of the population that views food by force as a human right
gives birth to a new generation lazier than the next every 19 years,
it used to be every 13 years but we lobbied to change the laws to slow
the growth rate by raising the age of both marriage and consent passed
what was set at the Catholic Council of Trent as 12 for girls which was much
older than the younger age some Jewish Rabbis and Muslim Imams permitted, to 18 in the modern United States excluding negligible local exceptions for some States and even
older than 18 in China and some other countries.
The non productive section of the population is increasing at an exponential growth rate and there will be mass rioting before the 33 year mark is hit in response to raises in food
prices when our food storage is reduced even before it hits the
halfway mark. We estimate in fact if something is not done to reduce
the birth rate of people unwilling to work for food the riots will
happen 19 years from now killing us before our next 33 year cycle is
complete.
Someone in the crowd named Selfish Malice yelled
People in some populations unwilling to work to grow food are actually
having some children even before they reach 18 and the single mothers
are getting more free stuff than those who marry working men before
having children. The plan to set the marriage to 18 did not work, so
looking back we should have just shot the useless eaters.
Someone else named Practical Cold Heart responded, "We all know they
outnumber us so we can not go around shooting them. What do you
propose we do about that Meritocracy?"
Meritocracy continued talking after they said their words
Look we need to reduce the population but only the population of
unworthy people in fact we need to increase the population of worthy
people if we want more food and clean water in our worldwide storage.
We have thought of many ways to do this in the past we tried genetic
testing and outlawing marriages in both the United States and Germany
but that became unpopular after that war that shall not be named and
we also found some people who fail the genetic lottery still choose to
work hard and some who are genetically gifted still squander what they
were given.
We tried IQ tests but we found out they did not test someone's ability
to think logically from a scientific perspective correctly but merely
one's ability to research what answers previous test designers wanted
in the number series, pattern series and raven's progressive matrices.
The vocabulary also was just plain poor because it was culturally
biased. It turns out the relatives of the people who design the test
snuck a peak at the desired answers and posted them in study guides
then people would just do arbitrary things like memorize the digits of
pi when to a scientific thinker the numbers could be anything since
there are multiple sequences that contain any finite sequence but to
someone who read the study guide with the stolen answers they knew to
look for pi.
But now I have discovered a true test that really evaluates what we
need and can enable people to eliminate themselves with much less
Karma on our hands than were we to shoot them directly and they will
not even riot. It will be a practical test based on a decision in
life when they do not know they are being tested so those malignant people we do not want alive can not cheat by memorizing official study guides to get the right answer while ignoring reality this time. Those we want alive have the capability to cheat by looking at reality instead of the official study guide within their chosen mindset. The only way to fail the test is to choose to ignore reality and the very act of cheating in this case would require paying enough
attention to reality that you could pass the test without cheating.
Meritocracy’s proposed test is described in the next Part
Part 5 Meritocrac’s test
Survey results are part of a fictitious story not based on a actual survey
Now the fundamental problem we face is willful ignorance,
approximately 80% of those willing to learn how to farm were also
willing to farm if given an offer of both free farming educational
courses and free land. More than 99% of the people who were unwilling
to take the small action of doing the free courses were also unwilling
to do the larger action of actually farming. Less than 1% of those
surveyed who claimed to have no previous farming knowledge or
experience were willing to do the large action of farming but not do
the small action of taking the free farming courses and frankly we do
not want people who do not know how to farm properly farming it is a
waste of resources when the land could be given to someone competent
enough to learn what they are doing before they do it.
Now what we clearly can do is not test someone's knowledge to
determine if they should be eliminated but instead test someone's
willingness to learn new knowledge.
I propose then that we intentionally educate the population on how
cults create a fear of learning knowledge that disagrees with what the
cult group teaches and how they use that fear of knowledge to control
people's behavior in ways that may be harmful to the cult member but
beneficial to the cult leader. We broadcast this information all over
the news and put it as a theme in fiction novels, books, tv shows,
movies and on the radio, even in college and high school courses to
reach the stupidest of them all who can not be reached by other means.
In fact we have already been doing so in dystopian fiction for decades
and have taught some of these principles in psychology and sociology
classes in colleges and high school albeit not devoting a large enough
of the percentage of the curriculum to it and not doing it in all high school and college courses but we should give one last final push and do so by at least a 10 fold greater magnitude.
Next after doing so for one year we give the test. We will switch
gears and go full force in the opposite direction. We will market
something on the news, a product or service to use and say if you do
not get it horrible things will happen to you and if you get it good
things will happen to you. We will then warn not to listen to outside
sources of information claiming the product can cause death, sterility
or adverse health effects because these outside sources are spreading
misinformation. We will then pump the alternative media they are told
not to listen to with the truth that this product or service can and
will cause these side effects a significant amount of the time.
We offer the product or service and ensure bad things happen to some
people who use it but not enough of them in a short enough immediate amount of time after they get the product or service that most people will figure it out and not take the product. But most of those willing to listen to and seriously and thoughtfully contemplate outside information apart from the approved channels will figure out not to take the product.
In this way we can reduce the population of those unwilling to produce
more than they consume by reducing the population of those unwilling
to take the time to learn new information. They would exterminate
themselves or prevent themselves from reproducing based on a personal
decision to remain ignorant.
Practical Cold Heart replied with a strong tone in his voice
No we must not do that not because it is morally wrong but because it
will not work since those in society who value equality outnumber
those who value merit. I myself value neither so long as I maintain
food sources for myself but value the appearance of doing both enough
to get people to comply to build my food supply. The vast majority of
the population outside this board room would rather have a hard hand
applied equally to both the worthy and the unworthy than have a soft
hand in which the unworthy eliminate themselves. We must enact harsh
legislation that affects even those who have done no wrong in order to
restrict the majority who would make bad choices if given the
opportunity to decide for themself. If we only sterilized those who
made a bad decision given a clear warning not to make that decision
and let those who do not make a bad decision go free the consequences
would be drastic. The majority of people would make the bad decision
and when they face the consequences of their own bad decision but the
minority who made the right choice are not punished they will say it
is unfair because it is not equal and then they will riot and kill us.
Instead I propose to appease the majority but also decrease the
population of those who consume more than they produce by decreasing
the birth rate of everyone worthy and unworthy alike. We shall
mandate the age of marriage to 40 years old minimum and do forced
abortions on anyone who is pregnant before 40 years old. Raising the
age of marriage to 18 lowered the birth rate as people often did not
marry until years passed the minimum viewing whatever the legal
minimum is as too young for most people being barely legal. I admit
that Selfish Malice is right that some single mothers have children
before the age of marriage and get rewarded with free hand outs but
that shall change from now on their will be no unwed single mothers
because we shall force abortions upon them. There shall be no
complaints of inequality resulting in riots because everyone will be
set to an equal minimum age as the standard, we must treat it equally
by gender no man shall be allowed to marry before 40 either and any
child produced by an unmarried man under 40 shall be aborted just the
same as a child produced by a unmarried woman under 40. We shall
allow divorces but only allow a child with the first person you are
married to and not allow marrying multiple people at once to prevent
complaints of inequality of a man being able to have more biological
children then a woman through a series of divorces and remarriages or
multiple marriages. We shall allow homosexual and bisexual same sex
marriages but only allow homosexuals and bisexuals to to marry one
person. This will be great in reducing the population because if a
bisexual person marries someone of the same gender they will there by
be forbidden from reproducing by being forbidden from also marrying
someone of the opposite gender all the while maintaining the claim of
equality since they are treated as equal to heterosexuals by also
being only allowed to marry one person. And we all know that
maintaining the claim of equality reduces the number of riots.
Then a vote was taken with three options to try Meritocracy’s
solution, to try Practical Cold Heart's solution or to try neither and
do something else to be decided later after more discussion.
Practical cold heart’s solution won the highest number of votes among
the three options.
The politicians were easily lobbied by the largest corporation in the
world known as, " "The holding house of the world itself."
And practical cold heart's solution became a law
This thus lead to the events preceding the previous posts in the
population numbers series in which a woman was impregnated by a
politician against her will and then was going to be forced to get an
abortion against her will but killed the abortionist
